What is interesting is that the government went to court to issue an injunction against Bill Benson to stop him from sharing the results of his research into the non-ratification of the 16th Amendment, When Benson requested permission to show his evidence to the court he was told it was "irrelevant."
In other words, the fact that he might actually be correct is not the issue. The court conceded he might be correct (and Judge James C. Fox admits as such in Sullivan Vs United States).
But the government is simply saying Benson is not allowed to share what he knows with his fellow Americans; a clear violation of the First Amendment.
In other words, the fact that he might actually be correct is not the issue. The court conceded he might be correct (and Judge James C. Fox admits as such in Sullivan Vs United States).
But the government is simply saying Benson is not allowed to share what he knows with his fellow Americans; a clear violation of the First Amendment.
No comments:
Post a Comment